Interesting Facts

Partisan Claims of ‘Russia Hoax’ Revived Ahead of 2020 Election

Share this:

Quick Take

President Donald Trump and his supporters on social media are citing unverified “Russian intelligence” from 2016 as proof that Hillary Clinton “was behind the entire Russian collusion hoax.” But that so-called intelligence is essentially a mirrored image of publicly obtainable info on the time. Federal investigations since then have documented a number of hyperlinks between Trump associates and people tied to the Russian authorities.

Full Story

Hillary Clinton ran for president 4 years in the past, however doubtful claims about her proceed to churn because the Trump administration rekindles allegations that ties between the president’s 2016 marketing campaign and Russia are a part of a “hoax.”

One such declare arose shortly earlier than the primary presidential debate on Sept. 29. Clinton, after all, shouldn’t be a candidate. But Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe wrote a one-page letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham on the day of the talk that mentioned “Russian intelligence” in July 2016 had claimed that Clinton “approved a campaign plan to stir up a scandal against U.S. Presidential candidate Donald Trump by tying him to Putin and the Russians’ hacking of the Democratic National Committee.”

Ratcliffe adopted with an vital caveat, writing that the U.S. intelligence neighborhood “does not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication.”

Despite that unverified and questionable provenance, partisan web sites and social media pages seized on the declare as proof that Clinton was accountable for the looks of hyperlinks between the Trump marketing campaign and Russia. President Donald Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., was amongst those that initially unfold it on social media, saying, “The Russia hoax was Hillary’s plan.”

In actuality, the connections between Trump marketing campaign associates and people tied to the Russian authorities in the course of the 2016 election have been effectively documented in stories from particular counsel Robert S. Mueller and the Republican-controlled Senate Intelligence Committee. Both discovered proof that justified the investigation into these ties, though neither report discovered proof of a legal conspiracy.

“In sum, the investigation established multiple links between Trump Campaign officials and individuals tied to the Russian government. Those links included Russian offers of assistance to the Campaign. In some instances, the Campaign was receptive to the offer, while in other instances the Campaign officials shied away,” the Mueller report mentioned. “Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.”

The Senate report, which was launched Aug. 18, detailed former Trump marketing campaign supervisor Paul Manafort’s connections to Russia and Ukraine, and located “his high-level access and willingness to share information with individuals closely affiliated with the Russian intelligence services … represented a grave counterintelligence threat.”

Manafort was one among six males concerned with Trump’s 2016 marketing campaign who’ve both pleaded responsible or been discovered responsible of crimes uncovered in the course of the Mueller probe.

It can also be effectively documented that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered pc networks and accounts associated to the Democratic Party to be hacked with a view to leak damaging details about Clinton and assist Trump’s marketing campaign. A joint evaluation by the CIA, FBI and the National Security Agency resulted in a 2017 report that detailed the extent of the Russian affect marketing campaign.

WikiLeaks launched the knowledge hacked by Russian authorities intelligence operatives and, based on the ultimate quantity of the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report, “the Trump Campaign sought to maximize the impact of those leaks to aid Trump’s electoral prospects.”

The committee report mentioned: “Staff on the Trump Campaign sought advance notice about WikiLeaks releases, created messaging strategies to promote and share the materials in anticipation of and following their release, and encouraged further leaks.”

Campaign officers appeared to Trump’s longtime affiliate and adviser Roger Stone for insights about WikiLeaks’ plans to launch info, and Stone would relay his purported information to Trump or senior aides, based on the report. The committee, nevertheless, couldn’t “reliably determine the extent of authentic, non-public knowledge about WikiLeaks that Stone obtained.”

Neither the Mueller report nor the Senate Intelligence Committee report counsel that Clinton orchestrated any of this.

But on Oct. 6, every week after his letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Ratcliffe, who served as a Republican congressman from Texas till he turned the director of nationwide intelligence on May 26, mentioned the president instructed him to declassify “additional documents.”

Trump took to Twitter the identical day, asserting: “I have fully authorized the total Declassification of any & all documents pertaining to the single greatest political CRIME in American History, the Russia Hoax. Likewise, the Hillary Clinton Email Scandal. No redactions!”

So far, this has included a closely redacted memorandum from the CIA to the FBI and two pages of closely redacted notes that former CIA director John Brennan had taken in 2016.

According to Ratcliffe’s letter, Brennan’s notes mentioned that the Russian intelligence evaluation included the “alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016, of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisers to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.”

Brennan dismissed the publication of these paperwork as being politically motivated. In an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper, he referred to as Ratcliffe’s transfer “selective declassification” that’s “designed to advance the political interests of Donald Trump and Republicans who are aligned with him.”

Brennan defined, “These were my notes from the 2016 period when I briefed President Obama and the rest of the national security council team about what the Russians were up to and I was giving examples of the type of access that the US intelligence community had to Russian information and what the Russians were talking about and alleging.”

But what “the Russians were talking about” in late July 2016 merely mirrored what was taking part in out in public at the moment.

In mid-June of 2016, the Democratic National Committee disclosed its servers had been hacked and the agency it employed to research the breach traced the hack to Russia. On July 22, 2016, WikiLeaks launched practically 20,000 DNC emails, and two days later Clinton marketing campaign supervisor Robby Mook mentioned in an interview with CNN that the timing of the discharge — shortly earlier than the Democratic National Convention — advised that Russia was attempting to assist Trump’s marketing campaign.

At a July 27, 2016, press convention, Trump mentioned he doubted that Russia was accountable for hacking the DNC pc community, however invited Russia to seek out Clinton’s private emails that had been deleted earlier than she left workplace. “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” he mentioned.

Four days later, Clinton advised in an interview on Fox News Sunday that Russia was serving to Trump.

“We know that Russian intelligence services hacked into the DNC and we know that they arranged for a lot of those emails to be released and we know that Donald Trump has shown a very troubling willingness to back up Putin, to support Putin.”

Clinton’s marketing campaign additionally criticized Trump’s name for the Russian authorities to “find” her emails.

But that’s not a scandal that Clinton “stirred up.” She was responding to Russia’s actions and Trump’s phrases.

There isn’t any proof that she was accountable for the federal counterintelligence investigation into the Trump marketing campaign ties with Russia. The truth is, a number of federal stories, together with the Mueller and Senate stories, hint the origins of the investigation to Trump marketing campaign aide George Papadopoulos.

As we have written, the Department of Justice’s inspector common mentioned the FBI launched its investigation after Papadopoulos instructed a “Friendly Foreign Government” (an Australian diplomat in London, based on the New York Times) that the marketing campaign had acquired details about Russia having dust on Clinton.

So, claims like this one — “Hillary Clinton was behind the entire Russian collusion hoax all along” — made by Republican Rep. Doug Collins of Georgia, together with a name to “#LockHerUp,” are unfounded.

But that hasn’t stopped such claims from spreading. Collins’ unique tweet was shared greater than 14,000 instances, and a conservative group referred to as FreedomWorks made the quote right into a meme that’s been shared tens of 1000’s of instances on Facebook.

Other main Trump allies are spreading comparable messages.

Kayleigh McEnany, the White House press secretary,[0]=AZUYhJ-HeS6llW-TrSTSQB310whNU6tV5OhKhPh9ZVCAchWRtdottEuDa8dAx3RpoFoi5ZKvY87BwwjHGD9oQJVqSMgcTDrLn6YjstEHq9AFbIz8uFru_f0iuLr_wnSqrHKMPFmUbKqq5Ouk8g7sbL_Ho3-ZHs-Vk7EB6MsXoGouShtBJ3cTvMXbIVx3fnL2Bys&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>wrote on Facebook, with a hyperlink to the Fox News story about Brennan’s declassified notes, “CROOKED Hillary denied our country a peaceful transition of power. SHE concocted the Russia hoax!”

Anti-Muslim activist Brigitte Gabriel requested for “nationally televised hearings about how the Russian probe was a HOAX.” And Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida claimed on Facebook, “The Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Hillary Clinton regime completely fabricated the Russia hoax. It was all FAKE.”

All of these assertions ignore the findings of a number of federal investigations they usually eschew confirmed U.S. intelligence in favor of unverified Russian intelligence.

Editor’s be aware: is one among a number of organizations working with Facebook to debunk misinformation shared on social media. Our earlier tales may be discovered right here.

This truth examine is offered at IFCN’s 2020 US Elections FactChat #Chatbot on WhatsApp. Click right here for extra.


Ratcliffe, John. Director of National Intelligence. Letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham. 29 Sep 2020.

Trump, Donald Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr). “OMG JUST DECLASSIFIED: The Russia hoax was Hillary’s plan, and the Obama-Biden White House was briefed on it.” Twitter. 29 Sep 2020.

Mueller, Robert S. III. “Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election.” U.S. Department of Justice. Mar 2019.

U.S. Senate. Select Committee on Intelligence. Report on Russian Active Measures, Campaigns and Interference within the 2016 U.S. Election. 2020.

Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Background to “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections”: The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution. 6 Jan 2017.

Singman, Brooke. “DNI declassifies Brennan notes, CIA memo on Hillary Clinton ‘stirring up’ scandal between Trump, Russia.” Fox News. 6 Oct 2020.

Trump, Donald (@actualDonaldTrump). “I have fully authorized the total Declassification of any & all documents pertaining to the single greatest political CRIME in American History, the Russia Hoax. Likewise, the Hillary Clinton Email Scandal. No redactions!” Twitter. 6 Oct 2020.

Cohen, Zachary and Alex Marquardt. “Former CIA director accuses intel chief of selectively declassifying documents to help Trump.” CNN. 6 Oct 2020.

Kiely, Eugene. “Timeline of Russia Investigation.” Updated 20 Feb 2020.

C-SPAN (@cspan). “Donald Trump: ‘Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.’” Twitter. 27 Jul 2016.

Kiely, Eugene, et al. “How Old Claims Compare to IG Report.” 10 Dec 2019.

Source hyperlink

Comment here