The Supreme Court on Wednesday, whereas announcing its verdict on a batch of petitions towards the Shaheen Bagh protests, held that public locations and roads can’t be occupied by folks indefinitely for demonstration.
A bench of the apex courtroom, headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, pronounced the decision by video conferencing.
The apex courtroom mentioned that no particular person can block public locations or carriageway to show. It made it clear that protest just isn’t acceptable at a public place and added that the authorities involved ought to see it.
“Public spaces and places can`t be occupied indefinitely whether in Shaheen bagh or elsewhere. The administration must keep such spaces free from obstructions. The protest should go on at the designated places,” the bench held.
The bench had on September 21 reserved its order on a variety of petitions searching for pointers and different instructions on the correct to protest in wake of the Shaheen Bagh protest the place a bunch of individuals had gathered for months to protest towards the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) blocking a key highway connecting Delhi and Noida.
The high courtroom was listening to a batch of petitions filed by the petitioner and lawyers-in-persons Amit Sahni and Shashank Deo Sudhi towards the protest, which had blocked a high traffic highway inflicting issues to the commuters, and searching for elimination of the protestors.
Thousands of individuals, together with a lot of Muslim ladies, had staged a sit-in protest at Delhi`s Shaheen Bagh space blocking a stretch of GD Birla Marg since mid-December final yr towards the CAA and the proposed National Register of Citizens.
The high courtroom had earlier appointed senior advocates — Sanjay Hedge, Sadhana Ramachandran and former bureaucrat Wajahat Habibullah — as interlocutors to speak to the protestors and persuade them to show at an alternate location.
The interlocutors had submitted their report in a sealed cowl in February.
The petitions filed within the matter had sought instructions to the respondents, together with the Centre, for laying down “detailed, comprehensive and exhaustive guidelines relating to outright restrictions for holding protest/agitation” resulting in obstruction of the general public house.