Top News

Publication of discover beneath Special Marriage Act non-obligatory; obligatory discover invades privateness: Allahabad HC

Share this:

The requirement of publication of discover beneath Section 6 and welcoming or entertaining objections beneath Section 7 can solely be learn as listing in nature, the court docket held.

In a major judgment affecting inter-faith {couples} searching for to get married beneath the Special Marriage Act, 1954, the Allahabad High Court has dominated that it could be non-obligatory and never obligatory for them to publish a discover about their meant marriage.

The provision for obligatory publication of discover, derived by way of “simplistic reading” of the actual regulation, “would invade in the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy, including within its sphere freedom to choose for marriage without interference from state and non-state actors, of the persons concerned,” the court docket mentioned in a judgment delivered on January 12.

Since the matter pertains to safety of basic rights of numerous individuals, the choose directed the senior registrar of the court docket to ship a replica of the order to U.P. Chief Secretary. The similar is to be communicated “to all the marriage officers in the State and other concerned authorities as expeditiously as possible”.

Justice Vivek Chaudhary mandated that whereas giving discover beneath Section 5 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 it shall be non-obligatory for the events to the meant marriage to make a request in writing to the wedding officer to publish or to not publish a discover beneath Section 6 and comply with the process of objections as prescribed beneath the Act.

‘Requirement of publication of notice directory’

“In case they do not make such a request for publication of notice in writing, while giving notice under Section 5 of the Act, the Marriage Officer shall not publish any such notice or entertain objections to the intended marriage and proceed with the solemnisation of the marriage,” the court docket mentioned.

The requirement of publication of discover beneath Section 6 and welcoming or entertaining objections beneath Section 7 can solely be learn as listing in nature, to be given impact solely on request of events to the meant marriage and never in any other case, the court docket noticed in a 47-page judgment.

The interpretation of Sections 6 and seven learn with Section 46 containing the process of publication of discover and welcoming objections to the meant marriage must be such that will uphold the basic rights and never violate them, the court docket mentioned.

The court docket was disposing of a habeas corpus writ filed by a Muslim girl who married a Hindu man after changing to his faith and as per Hindu rituals.

The girl’s father, nonetheless, objected to her dwelling together with her husband, regardless of the couple getting married on their very own free will. The girl and her father appeared in individual for the listening to on the path of the court docket. The girl expressed her want of eager to stay together with her husband and the daddy too “fairly accepted” her choice.

The couple informed the court docket they may have solemnised their marriage beneath the Special Marriage Act, 1954, however for the requirement of 30-days discover. They mentioned such a discover was an invasion of their privateness, drawing pointless social strain and interference of their life.

The private legal guidelines don’t impose such a situation earlier than solemnising a wedding, the couple submitted. The counsel for the petitioners additionally said that the state of affairs could change into extra important with the notification of Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Ordinance, 2020.

The counsel additional mentioned that younger {couples} should not able to lift these points earlier than getting their marriage solemnised as any litigation additional attracts pointless invasion into their privateness, exerting strain in opposition to their selection of a life associate.

Justice Chaudhary famous that marriages beneath private legal guidelines had been carried out by a spiritual head and didn’t require publication of any discover or calling for objections with regard to such a wedding. However, beneath the Special Marriage Act, 1954 any individual can object to the wedding on the bottom that it violates any of the circumstances of Section 4.

“There is no apparent reasonable purpose achieved by making the procedure to be more protective or obstructive under the Act of 1954, under which much less numbers of marriages are taking place, than procedure under the other personal laws, more particularly when this discrimination violates the fundamental rights of the class of persons adopting the Act of 1954 for their marriage,” the court docket mentioned.

However, if people go for the publication of the discover of their very own free will beneath theSpecial Marriage Act, 1954, such a publication and additional process wouldn’t be violative of their basic rights, the court docket mentioned.

You have reached your restrict without cost articles this month.

Subscription Benefits Include

Today’s Paper

Find mobile-friendly model of articles from the day’s newspaper in a single easy-to-read checklist.

Unlimited Access

Enjoy studying as many articles as you want with none limitations.

Personalised suggestions

A choose checklist of articles that match your pursuits and tastes.

Faster pages

Move easily between articles as our pages load immediately.


A one-stop-shop for seeing the most recent updates, and managing your preferences.


We temporary you on the most recent and most necessary developments, thrice a day.

Support Quality Journalism.

*Our Digital Subscription plans don’t presently embody the e-paper, crossword and print.

Source hyperlink

Comment here