SC initiates suo motu contempt proceedings Prashant Bhushan

Share this:

The Supreme Court on Wednesday initiated suo motu contempt proceedings in opposition to famous civil rights lawyer Prashant Bhushan, saying his tweets on its “role” within the “last six years” and {a photograph} of Chief Justice of India Sharad A. Bobde on a motorcycle undermines its dignity and the workplace of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) within the public eye.

“We are, prima facie, of the view that the aforesaid statements on Twitter have brought the administration of justice in disrepute and are capable of undermining the dignity and authority of the institution of Supreme Court in general and the office of the Chief Justice of India in particular, in the eyes of public at large. We take suo motu cognisance of the aforesaid tweet also apart from the tweet quoted above and suo motu register the proceedings”, a three-judge Bench led by Justice Arun Mishra recorded in a written order.

The courtroom issued contempt discover to Mr. Bhushan, to which he has to reply. It additionally issued discover to Attorney General Ok.Ok. Venugopal to help the courtroom within the proceedings. The case is scheduled for listening to on August 5.

Senior advocate Sajan Poovayya, showing for social media platform Twitter, mentioned the trigger title of the case confirmed ‘Twitter Communications India Pvt Limited’ because the respondent occasion. He mentioned the right description is ‘Twitter Incorporated, California, USA’.

The courtroom requested the social media platform to file a reply.

Another contempt case

Meanwhile, one other suo motu contempt case in opposition to Mr. Bhushan, relationship again to 2009, is listed on July 24 earlier than the identical mixture of judges. Former Tehelka journal editor Tarun Tejpal is a respondent occasion within the case with Mr. Bhushan.

The case was initiated on the premise of an interview given by Mr. Bhushan, through which he made remarks in regards to the presence of former CJI S.H. Kapadia on the Forest Bench of the apex courtroom that determined the Niyamgiri mining lease case in Odisha in favour of Sterlite Industries.

Last 12 months, Mr. Bhushan turned down a suggestion from the Supreme Court to “unconditionally apologise” to a Bench led by Justice Mishra throughout a contempt proceedings relating to his February 1, 2019 tweets claiming that the federal government misled the courtroom in regards to the appointment of M. Nageshwar Rao as interim CBI Director. Mr. Bhushan mentioned the tweets had been a “genuine mistake”.

Justice Mishra had then mentioned that if a lawyer had grievances with the administration of justice by a courtroom, he must return to the courtroom along with his queries moderately than voice them within the media.

“This is troubling all of us as an institution. This is happening in all cases of importance. Motives are attributed to judges,” Justice Mishra had noticed.

You have reached your restrict totally free articles this month.

To get full entry, please subscribe.

Already have an account ? Sign in

Show Less Plan

Subscription Benefits Include

Today’s Paper

Find mobile-friendly model of articles from the day’s newspaper in a single easy-to-read checklist.

Faster pages

Move easily between articles as our pages load immediately.

Unlimited Access

Enjoy studying as many articles as you would like with none limitations.


A one-stop-shop for seeing the most recent updates, and managing your preferences.

Personalised suggestions

A choose checklist of articles that match your pursuits and tastes.


We temporary you on the most recent and most necessary developments, thrice a day.

*Our Digital Subscription plans don’t at the moment embrace the e-paper ,crossword, iPhone, iPad cell functions and print. Our plans improve your studying expertise.

Source hyperlink

Comment here